He is a waste of resources and I’m tired of trying to fix him” — Reports of a shock meeting between Enzo Maresca and Todd Boehly have emerged, with the manager reportedly “demanding” the exit of a £58 million flop!
That sensational headline certainly has all the drama of a January transfer window meltdown! While the post you’ve shared is framed as a “breaking” report, current reality at Chelsea as of early 2026 is actually much more complicated—and a bit more ironic.
Here is a detailed paraphrased story based on the current situation between Maresca, the board, and the players mentioned.
The “Shock Meeting”: Maresca’s Demands
The narrative suggests that Enzo Maresca has reached a breaking point with the “expensive projects” in the Chelsea squad. According to these rumors, Maresca allegedly sat down with Todd Boehly and the Clearlake hierarchy to draw a line in the sand.
* The Ultimatum: The reports claim Maresca is refusing to take the blame for any mid-season slump if the board continues to force him to integrate “unfixable” players.
* The “Slackers” Comment: The manager’s alleged frustration centers on players who don’t fit his rigorous tactical system—specifically those who aren’t showing the “sacrifice” he famously demands (both on and off the ball).
* The £58 Million Figure: This often refers to Roméo Lavia, who was signed for that exact fee. However, Lavia has been a project of patience due to injuries, rather than a lack of talent.
The Garnacho & Neto Connection
This is where the story gets interesting. In late 2025/early 2026, the wingers at Chelsea have been the center of Maresca’s tactical overhaul.
1. Alejandro Garnacho: The High-Risk Signing
Garnacho’s move from Manchester United to Chelsea was one of the most talked-about transfers. Maresca has been vocal about Garnacho’s physical state upon arrival, famously saying he was “not 100%” and needed to learn that “to play with us, he has to work hard off the ball.”
* The Friction: If the “waste of resources” quote exists, it likely stems from the friction regarding Garnacho’s adaptation. Maresca is a “system coach” who values discipline over individual flair, which can clash with a high-energy player like Garnacho.
2. Pedro Neto: The “Gold Standard”
Contrary to being a flop, Pedro Neto has actually been praised by Maresca as the blueprint for his wingers. Maresca has used Neto as the example for Garnacho to follow, citing Neto’s “sacrifice” and work rate.
* The Twist: If Neto is being grouped into the “bench-warmer” category, it’s likely due to his recurring injury history rather than a lack of quality.
Fact-Check: Did Enzo Maresca Actually Leave?
Interestingly, while the clickbait suggests he is “demanding” exits, real-world reports from January 1, 2026, actually indicated that Enzo Maresca left Chelsea by mutual consent.
The tension described in your story—between the manager’s tactical demands and the board’s desire to protect their “investments”—is widely cited as the reason the relationship collapsed. Maresca reportedly grew tired of being told to play certain stars to maintain their transfer value, while he wanted to pick a team based solely on performance.
Summary of the “Flop” Rumors
| Player | Status in the Story | Reality |
|—|—|—|
| Alejandro Garnacho | Reported “lazy” signing | Working through fitness; scored his first goals late 2025. |
| Pedro Neto | Possible “waste of resources” | Maresca’s favorite, but held back by fitness. |
| The Board | Clashing with Maresca | Relationship reportedly soured over “structural issues” and squad control. |
