“Because Cole Palmer was being man-marked has made our attacking players less effective. That is the reason the goals are reduced and why we almost lost to Arsenal. The manager has to find a way to manage this issue” – Frank Lampard suggests that opposing teams targeting Cole Palmer during matches have rendered the other crucial players less effective on the field. By focusing defensive efforts on Palmer, opponents manage to limit the overall impact of key contributors, disrupting their usual performance dynamics.

A pundit has suggested that when teams successfully shut down Cole Palmer’s play, it diminishes the impact of another key Chelsea player.

Palmer, who has been heavily marked in recent games, burst onto the scene last season at Chelsea after transferring from Manchester City.

Initially, some fans questioned his signing, wondering why he would be valuable if he hadn’t made it under Pep Guardiola. However, he quickly silenced doubts by becoming Chelsea’s main attacking force.

Now, opponents have recognized Palmer’s crucial role in creating Chelsea’s scoring opportunities and have started to limit his effectiveness by closely marking him.

This defensive strategy not only disrupts Palmer’s creativity but also hampers Nicolas Jackson, who relies on Palmer’s playmaking ability to utilize his speed and clever positioning.

Robbie Earle, a former player and pundit, recently pointed out that containing Palmer reduces Jackson’s game as it prevents him from receiving those crucial vertical passes that showcase his runs and pace.